Welcome!
登入
註冊
美寶首頁
美寶百科
美寶論壇
美寶落格
美寶地圖
首頁
>
學涯 / Cultivation Career
>
學門 Academy
>
西方哲學
>
康德哲學
>
康德判斷力批判
Advanced
康德判斷力批判
作者:
主旨:
Tags:
Message:
gustav Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Responding to HP, it is interesting indeed there's > no the word "modality" literally written in §18. > Kant simply talks about "necesity" in stead of its > superordinate "modality," and directly distinguish > the necessity in judgment of taste from the > apodeictic necessity (which is derived from > determined concepts) and empirical necesity (which > means something goes as such so far so well and is > agreed with by all people, and which however for > Kant only occurs in common use of language because > experience alone can hardly support the evidence > of necessity). > > I contribute another interesting observation here: > do you notice that the distinction Kant made here > seems parallel to that in the first moment: liking > for the beautiful is distinguised from liking for > the good and liking for the agreeable; and that in > the second moment: The beautiful is presented as > the object of a universal liking which is > distinguished from the good and the agreeable. At > both of the latter cases, the good is always > determined with concepts, while the agreeable is > always connected with concepts too but moreover > insufficient for some necessary condition in each > moment. > > I think the message raised by HP is just an > observation, right? There's actually no problem > with the message.