Welcome!
登入
註冊
美寶首頁
美寶百科
美寶論壇
美寶落格
美寶地圖
首頁
>
學涯 / Cultivation Career
>
學門 Academy
>
西方哲學
>
康德哲學
>
康德判斷力批判
Advanced
康德判斷力批判
作者:
主旨:
Tags:
Message:
boris Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "Purposiveness" sounds like an object of cognition > in your question, which is quite worrying. > re: Confusing enough. According to Kant (3rd > Critique, not 1st theoretical and 2nd practical), > with my interpretation, Purposiveness is an a > priori principle of judgment (or may called a > priori legislating principle. It legislates the > principle for itself). It is subjective, yet > arguably, Kant tried to prove its > universality/communicability/suitability. And Kant > left necessity clause to possibility/contingency. > Therefore, the infamous "as-if" was invented and > used in philosophical language ever since. > Purposiveness with its subjectivity nature > accompanying with pseudo objectivity tendency, > Kant arguably imposed it to cognized objects > (nature), and imposed it to thing-in-itself > (freedom, morality, god, and so forth.) In the > final, Kant still reminded us, after all it "is" > AS-IF (in order to be consistent with his noumenon > unknownability claim.) > > Speaking causality, 3rd Critique, to my knowledge, > Kant only concerned causality with regard to > Nature/Science, i.e. theoretical judgments. I > will think it through for another reply to you.