Welcome!
登入
註冊
美寶首頁
美寶百科
美寶論壇
美寶落格
美寶地圖
首頁
>
學涯 / Cultivation Career
>
學門 Academy
>
西方哲學
>
康德哲學
>
康德判斷力批判
Advanced
康德判斷力批判
作者:
主旨:
Tags:
Message:
gustav Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "Purposiveness" sounds like an object of cognition > in your question, which is quite worrying. > > Basically speaking, the purposiveness or as-if > principle (look as if there WERE a rule for a > determination in a judgment) is about certain > extra causality required for human aware > experience other than the natural causality. On > the one hand, such an extra causality makes > experience in space and time possible for it > "offers" formal conformity so that (a) appearance > must be so perceived in space and time under logic > and (b) thus phenomena must be thinkable. > Therefore, such a principle in our awareness > yields the ground for science. On the other hand, > such an extra causality (a) makes it possible that > certain act of a "person" belongs to this "person" > ( similar to the formal conformity between an > object cognized and the object in one's > cognition/self-awareness, the act which is the > effect of certain concept of a person > (reason/purpose/motive etc.), is formally > determined to belong to that person); (b) the pure > intelligent being that human being can access or > involve in human's pure awareness (namely, person > in "freedom"), is the only thing intelligent > (among other pure ideas, or "transcendental > paralogisms/illusions in the First Critique, such > as God, soul etc. ) left via the most radical > self-critique of awareness itself, which is also > provided as the proof for the possible "practical" > employment of pure reason; (a) and (b) altogether > give a solid account and a finer understanding of > morality, and the humanity.