boris 的所有文章
Page 1 of 1 Pages: 1
Results 1 - 11 of 11
This essay, a simple and easy to read introduction, is posted in the web with mp3 audio.
http://juanvillage2012.scienceontheweb.net/?p=77
The following is a portion of it. It works for me to understand Hegel's system.
----------------------------------------------
Hegelian preliminaries
What, then, is the Phenomenology of Spirit about? Hegel says quite clearly in his “Introduction” to the
by
boris
-
黑格爾哲學
It has been a long time before last time I visited here.
Hegel's work is always posing a challenge to me. In Phenomenology of Spirit, the sense-certainty and perception, as a starter, I have trouble to even start to read; and did not get any help from lectures found to detailedly explain sentence by sentence. Winfield's lectures from University of Georgia helps a bit. Finally I got over it with
by
boris
-
黑格爾哲學
I have to admit questions I posted a year ago were not right questions. A thinker or a philosopher asking right questions will be a good start.
1. what is the main argument Hegel repudiated Kant's subject/object?
Not an important problem, the right question might be "what is the difference between Kant's transcendental unity of apperception and Hegel's consciousness?"
2. Kant's phenomenal an
by
boris
-
黑格爾哲學
Kant's Transcendental Deduction was grounded on that space and time are non-contextual. Hegel argued that time is not an empty container, and replaced it, the empty container, with "history", a concrete history. Thus begins Hegel's project of Spirit.
The hardest part of 3rd critique of Kant, my view, is the sublime. Kant's excerpts are scattered and didn't elaborate much on the subject of subli
by
boris
-
康德判斷力批判
What draws me to Hegelian Philosophy?
Simply put it, Hegelian-branded dialectic, by its peculiarity or eccentricity, is the area I would like to explore. About myself, I didn't receive any philosophy training academically; however, I had extensive science background. On that notion, I am not in any inclination to interpret philosophy terms the same way as philosophers do; however, I do not nece
by
boris
-
黑格爾哲學
Very clear explanation. So I learned, thanks for your professionalism. This tells apart academia from amateur.
On the notion of "what is the symbolic structure between beauty and morality?" I am interested to know your view (and/or current status) regarding the connection between Kant's aesthetics and teleology deduction? An onging research topic I believe.
-- A close look at the term c
by
boris
-
康德判斷力批判
Basically speaking, the purposiveness or as-if principle (look as if there WERE a rule for a determination in a judgment) is about certain extra causality required for human aware experience other than the natural causality.
re: Kant defined purposiveness as the causality of a concept with regard to its object. Is this the "certain extra causality" you mentioned? My read: the conceptual causalit
by
boris
-
康德判斷力批判
The sentence originally was commented by Robert Pippin, etc. as following,
"It is widely believed that no one really knows what he (Hegel) was talking about."
Compare the following two sentences:
"Nobody knows exactly what Hegel is talking about. " (Pippin's)
vs.
"Nobody knows what Hegel is exactly talking about. " (Skepticism)
Subjectively or objectively speaking? Either way Hegelian
by
boris
-
黑格爾哲學
"Purposiveness" sounds like an object of cognition in your question, which is quite worrying.
re: Confusing enough. According to Kant (3rd Critique, not 1st theoretical and 2nd practical), with my interpretation, Purposiveness is an a priori principle of judgment (or may called a priori legislating principle. It legislates the principle for itself). It is subjective, yet arguably, Kant tried to p
by
boris
-
康德判斷力批判
I have always wondered what is the main argument Hegel repudiated Kant's subject/object, phenomenon/noumenon saparation. Kant's noumenon preserves humanity, and leaves a room for morality and religion. Hegel's repudiation of noumenon is the point of departure forever. There is no place for god in Hegelian dialectic, and it (god) perpeturely is replaced by self-consciousness (dialectically evolv
by
boris
-
黑格爾哲學
Purposiveness (purposefulness) as well as Kant's "as-if" metaphor is the key. What is the inference of "intuitive, imaginary" purposiveness onto phenomenon and noumenon? Without "as-if" purposefulness (deternimating judgment), science cannot be possible, and without "as-if" purposefulness (reflective judgment), morality cannot be possible.
by
boris
-
康德判斷力批判