Welcome!
登入
註冊
美寶首頁
美寶百科
美寶論壇
美寶落格
美寶地圖
首頁
>
學涯 / Cultivation Career
>
學門 Academy
>
東方思想
>
佛學
>
佛教知識論
Advanced
佛教知識論
作者:
主旨:
Tags:
Message:
gustav Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Thank you for your reply. As I point out in the > later part of the article, the two > concepts/technical terms "appearance" and > "intuition" are distinct from each other quite > fuzzily. And at this part exactly shows the > systematical discrepancy between Kant's and > Dignaga's epistemology (Dignaga holds that the > ultimate truth falls in appearance, i.e., to > Dignaga appearance is the true perception, and the > reproduced intuition is not true perception; while > Kant holds that the truth is the proper relation > between intuition and concept which has some a > priori basis, and at best we can relate ourselves > with appearance in our very way of > experience/awareness only in beauty). The two > terms are basically divided sharply by appearance > being indeterminate while intuition being either > indeterminate or determined. The division in Kant > is not kept in consistency as well. But there is > some reason for the inclarity, and of course for > the division of "particular/perception" into > "appearance" and "intuition". > > In the paragraph you were mentioning, I write > "Fifth, the particulars in our experience is fuzzy > that they are both manifold and singular" which > has hints as well abou the above inclarity. To put > more precisely, the particular object, or aspect > of object, in our awareness in Kant has been > characterized as manifold and singular. Appearance > is the idealized aspect of the origin of the > manifoldness in our experience; intuition is the > idealized aspect of origin of the particularity > which does not loose the manifoldness.