Re: Purposiveness (purposefulness) and Kant's "as-if" metaphor (Re: 試問怎麼讀《判斷力批判》？)


Very clear explanation. So I learned, thanks for your professionalism. This tells apart academia from amateur.

On the notion of "what is the symbolic structure between beauty and morality?" I am interested to know your view (and/or current status) regarding the connection between Kant's aesthetics and teleology deduction? An onging research topic I believe.

-- A close look at the term causality is needed when it is used . We, as well as Kant use causal relationship so readily. The possible "recursion" constitutes Kant's concern and hardship - to explain judgment by using judgment.

This entry was posted by boris 於 週四, 五月 12. 2011 時間 05:45. and is filed under 康德判斷力批判. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own blog.

引用

引用此文章特定的 URI (網址)

    沒有引用

迴響

迴響顯示方式 (直線程 | 分線程)

  1. gustav says:
    #1 2011-05-12 06:47 (回覆)

    Thanks for the discussion!
    I look forward to further discussion with you.


新增迴響


Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA